New reply from Damian Hind M.P

We had anther email from our M.P Damian Hind over the 20 day off rule. We think you should lobby your M.P over this matter at least you can say you did everything you could to stop it. Our M.P is new and is still learning his trade but it does him good to know that we are watching him! Over all Damian is a good M.P and at least he replies to you he also does  listen to what you say.

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Williams and Peter,

Thank you for your further message.

First of all, may I congratulate Peter on his recent successes – and I hope he will be equally successful in the British competition.

I am once again bringing your concerns to the attention of the Minister and seeking his answers to the specific points you have made and  his confirmation that your objections have been noted.

Kind regards,

Damian

here is our email to Damian

Dear  Damian 

Home education is undermined by the 20 days the child name stays on a school register  as it is parents in law  who are responsible for seeing that a child receives a suitable full time education.

We ask again where is the evidence that we need this change? Show us?

Why the rush to bring it in via Statutory Instrument?

Why where home educators not consulted about this and only found out about it by chance? In other words the Department for Education was hoping to just sneak it in! Time can always be made to consult!

What is to stop the 20 day rule being extended to say 30 days or 40 days?

Will a child name stay on a private school register  for 20 days if parents says it is home educating?

None of these question have been answered

It must be recorded    by you as our M.P(we can only lobby you) that we are against this change and we know of other home educators as well who do not agree with this change.

If that was the only change in the pipe line I guess home educators could live with it but we have a feeling this is just the start of  attempting to change the law on home education? Thank goodness Peter will soon be 16 and not be affected by any of it.

Peter won  Uxbridge Adult chess open and qualified again for the British Adult chess championship for this yea.r 

Best Regards

Peter Carol Peter

Peter new FIDE chess grade is 2196

Peter new FIDE Chess grade is 2196 here is the link  http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=2275740
Well done Peter! to get an international chess grade you have to play in a chess tournament that is FIDE rated not all chess tournaments are! Peter gained 23 points when he won the Uxbridge Adult chess open and also drew with 2 grandmasters Mark Hebden  and Keith Arkell.

I don't think people understand how hard it is to get your grade to this level it takes a lot of work study reading of chess books which Peter does and then you have to do it on the chess board in a real game where if you slip up you will lose rating points!

Peter wants to become an IM(international Master you need a grade of 2300 and 3 master norms which you can only get in certain events!

Peter still only 15 so hopefully in couple of years he achieve this.

Any one else out their Plays chess or would like to ask question then please leave a comment on here and we will do our best to answer you.

Damian Hind M.P

Damian Hind M.P has sent us an email in which he believe the 20 day rule of child staying on the  school register helps home education! It is quite clear that Damian has not listened to anything we have said to him. Any way here his the email he sent and our reply to him.We think you do have to attempt to lobby your M.P  so that he knows you as the voter do not agree with him and you can know you have done everything you can to try and stop this 20 day idea.

Dear Mr  &  Mrs Williams and Peter

Having discussed this with the minister, as well as reading the Permanent Secretary’s explanatory letter, I must say it seems an entirely sensible move to me.  I am not sure what your objection would be to making such a move by Statutory Instrument.  The Permanent Secretary makes it quite clear that this does not adversely impact the right to home educate – indeed if anything I would have thought at the margin it would strengthen it.

Sincerely

Damian Hinds M.P

Our reply to Damian Hinds

Dear Mr Hinds

 

The response you have given in no way addresses any of the concerns we and others have made.  It is really just saying trust us and go away.

 

The truth of the matter is  that this is just the first tiny step in making it more difficult for people to Home Educate.  If as stated in David Bell's letter the aim is to  ensure that any issues  that may have led to the parent withdrawing their child from school then surely this change should be given much more thought, consideration and consultation - oh silly us people might have said they didn't agree with it and where would the Department of Education be then!  Government always rushes through things that it knows people won't like hoping that there is no time to object.

 

As you and/or the Department of Education have chosen not to answer the detailed questions we have asked then we can only assume that indeed ours and others concerns are well founded.  We once again give you the opportunity to answer in detail the concerns  we raised in our email below  and prove that we are wrong.

 

As our elected MP we must lobby you about the things that are important to us and this subject is very close to our hearts not just for ourselves but for the Home Educators of the future because the way the Education system is going there is going to be more and more of us.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Peter, Carol & Peter Williams

A Home Educating Family